Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: A comparison of symptoms and quality of life before and after nasal septoplasty and radiofrequency therapy of the inferior turbinate

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
1 Feb 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
26 Feb 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Saeedia Khwaja
22 Apr 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Omar Mirza
22 May 2017 Author responded Author comments - Ann Helen Nilsen
Resubmission - Version 2
22 May 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
8 Jun 2017 Author responded Author comments - Ann Helen Nilsen
Resubmission - Version 3
8 Jun 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
13 Jun 2017 Author responded Author comments - Ann Helen Nilsen
Resubmission - Version 4
13 Jun 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 4
20 Nov 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Mustafa ÇELİK
28 Nov 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Babak Saedi
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
22 Dec 2017 Editorially accepted
26 Jan 2018 Article published 10.1186/s12901-017-0050-z

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement