Peer Review reports
From: Is OperaVOX a clinically useful tool for the assessment of voice in a general ENT clinic?
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3 Nov 2016 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 29 Nov 2016 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Shane Lester |
| 10 Dec 2016 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Joanne Patterson |
| 17 Jan 2017 | Author responded | Author comments - Richard Teck Kee Siau |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 17 Jan 2017 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 6 Feb 2017 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Joanne Patterson |
| 19 Feb 2017 | Author responded | Author comments - Richard Teck Kee Siau |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 19 Feb 2017 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 28 Mar 2017 | Author responded | Author comments - Richard Teck Kee Siau |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 28 Mar 2017 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 4 Apr 2017 | Author responded | Author comments - Richard Teck Kee Siau |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 4 Apr 2017 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| Publishing | ||
| 5 Apr 2017 | Editorially accepted | |
| 21 Apr 2017 | Article published | 10.1186/s12901-017-0037-9 |
You can find further information about peer review here.