Table 4 Odds ratios estimated by logistic regression showing factors related to a 20-point improvement in THI score
From: Effectiveness of a tinnitus management programme: a 2-year follow-up study
Follow-up questionnaire after 1 month | Follow-up questionnaire after 1–2 years | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Odds ratio | p-value | Odds ratio | p-value | |
Age (continuous variable) | 1,083 | 0,012 | 1,027 | 0,479 |
Woman (= 1) vs. Man | 1,234 | 0,789 | 0,942 | 0,944 |
Skilled worker (= 1) vs. Others | 1,447 | 0,637 | 0,793 | 0,782 |
Tinnitus duration: >5 years (= 1) vs. ≤ 5 years | 0,205 | 0,027 | 1,130 | 0,869 |
Tinnitus strength: Loud or very loud (= 1) vs. Weaker | 0,877 | 0,893 | 4,408 | 0,166 |
Tinnitus sounds: High-pitched whine/singing (= 1) vs. Others | 0,520 | 0,415 | 0,478 | 0,448 |
Baseline THI score (continuous variable) | 1,057 | 0,005 | 1,064 | 0,007 |
Sound intolerance: Yes (= 1) vs. No | 2,718 | 0,193 | 0,656 | 0,599 |
CHC therapist: Therapist 1 (= 1) vs. Therapists 2+3 | 9,551 | 0,016 | 9,655 | 0,062 |
Hearing aid type: Phonak (= 1) vs. GN Resound | 2,995 | 0,121 | 1,011 | 0,988 |
Client's lifestyle changes: Yes (= 1) vs. No | 1,288 | 0,713 | 0,826 | 0,825 |
Constant term | 0,000 | 0,000 | 0,001 | 0,012 |