Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

The risk of bias in randomized controlled trials in otorhinolaryngology: hardly any improvement since 1950

BMC Ear, Nose and Throat DisordersBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201717:3

DOI: 10.1186/s12901-017-0036-x

Received: 22 December 2016

Accepted: 5 April 2017

Published: 18 April 2017

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
22 Dec 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
29 Jan 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Saeedia Khwaja
14 Feb 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Maha Khan
22 Feb 2017 Author responded Author comments - Jeroen P.M. Peters
Resubmission - Version 2
22 Feb 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
31 Mar 2017 Author responded Author comments - Jeroen P.M. Peters
Resubmission - Version 3
31 Mar 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
5 Apr 2017 Editorially accepted
18 Apr 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12901-017-0036-x

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht
(2)
Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, University Medical Center Utrecht
(3)
Cochrane Netherlands, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht

Advertisement