Evaluation of young smokers and non-smokers with Electrogustometry and Contact Endoscopy
© Pavlos et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2009
Received: 13 November 2008
Accepted: 20 August 2009
Published: 20 August 2009
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|13 Nov 2008||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|30 Dec 2008||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Greg Essick|
|3 Jan 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Albertino Bigiani|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|4 Feb 2009||Author responded||Author comments - Pavlos Pavlidis|
|18 Feb 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Albertino Bigiani|
|9 Mar 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Greg Essick|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|4 Feb 2009||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|4 Jun 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Greg Essick|
|3 Jul 2009||Author responded||Author comments - Pavlos Pavlidis|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|3 Jul 2009||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|30 Jul 2009||Author responded||Author comments - Pavlos Pavlidis|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|30 Jul 2009||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|20 Aug 2009||Editorially accepted|
|20 Aug 2009||Article published||10.1186/1472-6815-9-9|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.