The use of research questionnaires with hearing impaired adults: online vs. paper-and-pencil administration
© Thorén et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 25 August 2011
Accepted: 27 October 2012
Published: 29 October 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|25 Aug 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|8 Dec 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Pascal Senn|
|20 Jul 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Robert Folmer|
|29 Aug 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Elisabet Sundewall Thorén|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|29 Aug 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|3 Oct 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Pascal Senn|
|4 Oct 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Robert Folmer|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|27 Oct 2012||Editorially accepted|
|29 Oct 2012||Article published||10.1186/1472-6815-12-12|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.